This image represents a periodic tiling of the plane with hexagons colored with seven colors, having plenty of nice mathematical properties. One of them is this: if you take any two points the distance between which is given by the little black rod shown on the upper left, then these two points cannot have the same color. In other words, no matter how you move the rod in the picture, so long as you don't change its size, the two ends will fall on different colors.

Can this be done with fewer than seven colors? In other words, is
there a way to color the plane (not necessarily perodically) using six
colors or less, in such a way that any two points separated by a
certain distance `d` fixed *a priori* are always of
different colors? Interestingly enough, the answer to this problem is
not known: I believe this is still an open problem. (I don't know who
asked the question in the first place. It sounds typical of Pál
Erdős, but that's mere guessing.)

Probably this is the mathematical problem with the simplest formulation which is still open.

It can be shown, however, that no plane coloring with
*three* or less colors can do the trick: if you color the
plane, in any way whatsoever, using three colors or less, and you fix
an arbitrary distance `d`, then there are always, somewhere,
two points separated by that distance `d` that are of the
same color. This is a very nice mathematical exercise, because it
requires almost no knowledge of geometry (let alone of any other
domain of mathematics), and yet it is not at all obvious—almost
an exercise of pure reasoning. I remember hitting my head against the
walls for quite some time before I found the trick; and I occasionally
gave it to students to try, nearly driving some of them mad. The
problem with *two* colors (showing that two colors or fewer
cannot suffice to color the plane in such a way that two points at
distance `d` are not of the same color), however, is very
simple, and anyone should be able to solve that; and it holds the key
to solving the case of three colors.

So I can't be held responsible for people banging their head
against walls, I'll provide the answer to the two- and three-color
problems now. (Click here
to reveal the following text if it is invisible.) First, the
two-color case: consider an equilateral triangle with side
`d` anywhere in the plane; then each vertex of the triangle
cannot be of the same color as any other vertex, and this means that
there are at least three colors. Now the three-color case: suppose we
have a coloring of the plane with three colors such that no two points
at distance `d` are of the same color (and we want to reach a
contradiction). Consider an equilateral triangle `ABC` of
side `d` again: then certainly its three vertices must be of
all three colors. So if we put another equilateral triangle side to
side, say `BCD`, then the color of point `D` must be
the same as the color of point `A` (since they share the edge
`BC`: the color cannot be that of `B` nor that of
`C`, and there are only three colors). So `D` has
the same color as `A`, but this is true whenever the figure
can be drawn, that is, whenever the distance between `A` and
`D` is that of two equilateral triangles of side `d`
sharing a common side (this means the distance between `A`
and `D` is sqrt(3)·`d` but that's unimportant). If
we draw the entire circle of center `A` having that distance
as radius, then *all* points on that circle are supposed to
have the same color as `A`; and we can certainly find two
points on that circle having distance `d`, a
contradiction, which completes the proof.

Perhaps this is a nice test to determine whether a person is mathematically inclined, or could be, even if that person has no knowledge of mathematics: anyone so inclined will not resist thinking about such a simple and elegant problem for some time.