<foo> simply produces <foo>in the text).
<URL: http://somewhere.tld/ >,
and it will be automatically made into a link.
(Do not try any other way or it might count as an attempt to spam.)mailto: URI,
e.g. mailto:my.email@somewhere.tld,
if you do not have a genuine Web site).
Legislator (2019-01-15T15:51:19Z)
Également pertinent : <URL: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/motions >
Legislator (2019-01-10T13:03:22Z)
So zeitgemäß! <URL: https://verfassungsblog.de/brexit-and-the-speaker-of-the-house-of-the-commons-do-the-ends-justify-the-means/ >
Nick Mandatory (2018-12-07T19:47:25Z)
Est-ce que tu connais des œuvres de fiction déjà existantes qui pourraient ressembler à ça, ou plaire à des gens qui ont aimé tes deux fragments ?
jonas (2018-12-07T13:50:05Z)
Sorry, that was an unfair suggestion of me. Obviously Asimov already has good examples showing each of the three branches of government at work. <i>Bicentennial man<i> shows the legislative branch; “Blind Alley” shows the executive branch; and “Galley Slave” shows the work of the judicial branch in a case when nobody was telepathically tampering with the judge's mind (I don't care about Giskard's excuses).
Ruxor (2018-12-07T12:05:36Z)
@jonas: The idea is that, just like the "executive" fragment is written from the perspective of a novice Prime minister, and the "legislative" fragment from that of a novice legislator, the third fragment should be written from the perspective of the judge — a new judge recently appointed to some kind of supreme court.
jonas (2018-12-07T07:13:49Z)
Do you even need to write the third part? Asimov has already described the trial of the Encyclopedists in the first chapter of <i>Foundation</i>.